RA-01-0021 – Door Unlocking Mechanism – 2010-2016 Aston Martin

SEOCONTENT-START

OMB Control No.: 2127-0004 Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Manufacturer Name : Aston Martin Lagonda of North America Submission Date : FEB 22, 2016 NHTSA Recall No. : 15V-846 Manufacturer Recall No. : NR Manufacturer Information : Manufacturer Name : Aston Martin Lagonda of North Americ Address : Banbury Road Gaydon Warwick, United Kingdom 00 CV35 0DB Company phone : 999 Number of potentially involved : 5,516 Population : Estimated percentage with defect : 100 Vehicle Information : Vehicle : 2009-2015 Aston Martin DB9 Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : ALL Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door and 4 Door Sports Cars Production Dates : JAN 09, 2009 – SEP 12, 2015 VIN (Vehicle Identification Number) Range Begin : SCFFDAAE9AGA12515 End : SCFFDAFM1GGB17087 ✔ Not sequential VINs Vehicle : 2009-2012 Aston Martin DBS Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : Sports Car Production Dates : MAY 18, 2009 – SEP 04, 2012 VIN (Vehicle Identification Number) Range Begin : End : Not sequential VINs Vehicle : 2010-2016 Aston Martin V8 Vantage Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 DOOR SPORTS CAR Production Dates : SEP 03, 2009 – NOV 20, 2015 Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 Page 2 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 VIN (Vehicle Identification Number) Range Begin : End : Not sequential VINs Vehicle : 2012-2012 Aston Martin Virage Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door Sports Car Production Dates : JAN 21, 2011 – AUG 25, 2012 VIN (Vehicle Identification Number) Range Begin : SCFFDECN1CGG13330 End : SCFFDEDN5CGH14580 ✔ Not sequential VINs Description of Noncompliance : Description of the Noncompliance : The subject vehicles contain a full locking system software, which according to an interpretation letter issued by NHTSA, does not meet certain door lock requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 206, Door locks and door retention components (49 C.F.R §571.206). In the subject vehicles, each door is equipped with a locking mechanism with an operating means from the interior of the vehicle. However, when the full locking system is mobilised (by double locking the vehicle), this disengages the interior operating means for unlocking the door locking mechanism. As such, the full locking system is an effective anti-theft measure. FMVSS 1 :206 – Door locks and door retention components FMVSS 2 :NR Description of the Safety Risk : In an affected vehicle, where the full locking system has been activated from the exterior, there is a risk that occupants are unable to unlock the doors from the inside of the vehicle. In relation to our 4-door sports cars (Rapide and Rapide S), this risk is the same as if a person were in a vehicle in which the child locks were engaged. However, all our vehicles have an acoustic warning device (i.e. horn), which can still be activated from the interior of the vehicle when the ignition is switched off and the full locking system is activated. Furthermore, some vehicles are fitted with an alarm system with interior detection, which is able to detect an occupant’s movement and will activate the vehicle’s alarm if the full locking mechanism is activated and occupants are detected inside the vehicle. Description of the Cause : At the end of September 2015, Aston Martin received a copy of the NHTSA 2007 interpretation letter addressed to Keykert USA. In that letter NHTSA deemed that a certain theft deterring double-lock function does not meet the requirements of FMVSS No.206. Aston Martin immediately conducted an investigation to analyse the functionality of the full locking system in its vehicles in the USA, and to determine if the condition – which is compliant with European standards, was non-compliant with the United Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 Page 3 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 States’ Door Lock requirements of 49 CFR § 571.206. Until then, we firmly believed we were fully compliant with both requirements, given they are worded identically. Identification of Any Warning that can Occur : an acoustic warning device (i.e. horn), which can still be activated from the interior of the vehicle when the ignition is switched off and the full locking system is activated. Furthermore, some vehicles are fitted with an alarm system with interior detection, which is able to detect an occupant’s movement and will activate the vehicle’s alarm if the full locking mechanism is activated and occupants are detected inside the vehicle. Supplier Identification : Component Manufacturer Name : NR Address : NR NR Country : NR Chronology : At the end of September 2015, Aston Martin received a copy of the NHTSA 2007 interpretation letter addressed to Keykert USA. In that letter NHTSA deemed that a certain theft deterring double-lock function does not meet the requirements of FMVSS No.206. Aston Martin immediately conducted an investigation to analyse the functionality of the full locking system in its vehicles in the USA, and to determine if the condition – which is compliant with European standards, was non-compliant with the United States’ Door Lock requirements of 49 CFR § 571.206. Until then, we firmly believed we were fully compliant with both requirements, given they are worded identically. Our Recall Committee met on December 11th 2015 and determined that the full locking system was not compliant with NHTSA’s interpretation of FMVSS No. 206, and that notification in accordance with 49 CFR Part 573 was necessary. Description of Remedy : Description of Remedy Program : Remedy Aston Martin will update the unsold noncompliant vehicles prior to sale. Aston Martin intends to file a petition for exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of the Motor Vehicle Safety Act pursuant to 49 C.F. R Part 556, on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. How Remedy Component Differs from Recalled Component : The software level in the Central Electronic Module is updated. Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 Page 4 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Identify How/When Recall Condition was Corrected in Production : Update the vehicle car configuration file to disable the double locking function from production date 9th December 2015 Recall Schedule : Description of Recall Schedule : Not Applicable Planned Dealer Notification Date : NR – NR Planned Owner Notification Date :NR – NR * NR – Not Reported

**************************************************************************************************************

OMB Control No.: 2127-0004 Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Manufacturer Name : Aston Martin Lagonda of North America Submission Date : JUN 24, 2016 NHTSA Recall No. : 15V-846 Manufacturer Recall No. : RA-01-0021 Manufacturer Information : Manufacturer Name : Aston Martin Lagonda of North America Address : Banbury Road Gaydon Warwick, United Kingdom 00 CV35 0DB Company phone : 999 Population : Number of potentially involved : 6,076 Estimated percentage with defect : 100 % Vehicle Information : Vehicle 1 : 2010-2015 Aston Martin DB9 Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : ALL Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door Sports Car Production Dates : AUG 14, 2009 – NOV 30, 2015 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFFDAAE8AGA12490 End : SCFFDAFM0GGB17078 ✔ Not sequential Vehicle 2 : 2010-2012 Aston Martin DBS Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : Sports Car Production Dates : APR 08, 2009 – SEP 03, 2012 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFFDCBD1AGE01487 End : SCFFBCCD2CGE13381 ✔ Not sequential Vehicle 3 : 2010-2016 Aston Martin V8 Vantage Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 DOOR SPORTS CAR Production Dates : JUN 25, 2009 – NOV 20, 2015 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFEBBAC4AGC13387 End : SCFEKBBK6GGD20410 Not sequential Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 Page 2 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Vehicle 4 : 2012-2012 Aston Martin Virage Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door Sports Car Production Dates : JAN 24, 2011 – AUG 31, 2012 Vehicle 5 : 2010-2016 Aston Martin Rapide Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 4-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 4 Door Sports Car Production Dates : MAR 30, 2010 – NOV 26, 2015 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFHDDAJ4AAF00068 End : SCFHMDBS4GGF05283 ✔ Not sequential Vehicle 6 : 2014-2016 Aston Martin Vanquish Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door Sports Car Production Dates : SEP 10, 2012 – NOV 26, 2015 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFLDCFP7EGJ00054 End : SCFPMCGU3GGK02881 ✔ Not sequential Vehicle 7 : 2011-2016 Aston Martin V12 Vantage Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door Sports Car Production Dates : JUN 24, 2010 – NOV 25, 2015 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFEBBCF4BGS00483 End : SCFEKBFR5GGS22411 ✔ Not sequential Vehicle 8 : 2012-2013 Aston Martin V12 Zagato Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door Sports Car Production Dates : NOV 21, 2012 – JUN 14, 2013 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFEBBGF8CGS31182 End : SCFGBBGF5DGS31375 ✔ Not sequential Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 Page 3 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Description of Noncompliance : Description of the Noncompliance : The subject vehicles contain a full locking system software, which according to an interpretation letter issued by NHTSA, does not meet certain door lock requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 206, Door locks and door retention components (49 C.F.R §571.206). In the subject vehicles, each door is equipped with a locking mechanism with an operating means from the interior of the vehicle. However, when the full locking system is mobilised (by double locking the vehicle), this disengages the interior operating means for unlocking the door locking mechanism. As such, the full locking system is an effective anti-theft measure. FMVSS 1 : 206 – Door locks and door retention components FMVSS 2 : NR Description of the Safety Risk : In an affected vehicle, where the full locking system has been activated from the exterior, there is a risk that occupants are unable to unlock the doors from the inside of the vehicle. In relation to our 4-door sports cars (Rapide and Rapide S), this risk is the same as if a person were in a vehicle in which the child locks were engaged. However, all our vehicles have an acoustic warning device (i.e. horn), which can still be activated from the interior of the vehicle when the ignition is switched off and the full locking system is activated. Furthermore, some vehicles are fitted with an alarm system with interior detection, which is able to detect an occupant’s movement and will activate the vehicle’s alarm if the full locking mechanism is activated and occupants are detected inside the vehicle. Description of the Cause : At the end of September 2015, Aston Martin received a copy of the NHTSA 2007 interpretation letter addressed to Keykert USA. In that letter NHTSA deemed that a certain theft deterring double-lock function does not meet the requirements of FMVSS No.206. Aston Martin immediately conducted an investigation to analyse the functionality of the full locking system in its vehicles in the USA, and to determine if the condition – which is compliant with European standards, was non-compliant with the United States’ Door Lock requirements of 49 CFR § 571.206. Until then, we firmly believed we were fully compliant with both requirements, given they are worded identically. Identification of Any Warning that can Occur : an acoustic warning device (i.e. horn), which can still be activated from the interior of the vehicle when the ignition is switched off and the full locking system is activated. Furthermore, some vehicles are fitted with an alarm system with interior detection, which is able to detect an occupant’s movement and will activate the vehicle’s alarm if the full locking mechanism is activated and occupants are detected inside the vehicle. Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 Page 4 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Supplier Identification : Component Manufacturer Name : NR Address : NR NR Country : NR Chronology : At the end of September 2015, Aston Martin received a copy of the NHTSA 2007 interpretation letter addressed to Keykert USA. In that letter NHTSA confirmed that a certain theft deterring double-lock function does not meet the requirements of FMVSS No.206. Aston Martin immediately conducted an investigation to analyse the functionality of the full locking system in its vehicles in the USA, and to determine if the condition – which was compliant with European standards, was incompliant with the United States’ Door Lock requirements of 49 CFR § 571.206. Until then, we firmly believed we were fully compliant of FMVSS No.206. Our Recall Committee met on December 11 2015 and determined that the full locking system was not compliant with the U.S. requirements, and that notification in accordance with 49 CFR Part 573 was necessary. On January 5, 2016 Aston Martin filed for a petition for exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of the Motor Vehicle Safety Act pursuant to 49 C.F.R Part 556, on the basis that the noncompliance was inconsequential to motor vehicle safety (the “Petition”). Aston Martin received a letter from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on June 21 2016, which denied Aston Martin’s Petition. Aston Martin is now submitting its notification in accordance with 49 CFR Part 573. Description of Remedy : Description of Remedy Program : Remedy Aston Martin will disable the double locking feature on all affected vehicles by reprogramming the software. How Remedy Component Differs from Recalled Component : The software level in the Central Electronic Module is updated. Identify How/When Recall Condition was Corrected in Production : Update the vehicle car configuration file to disable the double locking function from production date 9th December 2015 Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 Page 5 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Recall Schedule : Description of Recall Schedule : Reimbursement Plan Owners of all potentially affected vehicles will be notified to take their vehicle to an Aston Martin dealer. The software update will be installed at no cost to the owner. Notification Schedule It is Aston Martin’s intention to notify all 6,076 customers (231 unsold cars with dealers, 5845 sold cars with customers) who are listed in the table above. Aston Martin will provide copies of the notification schedule, including mail dates for the owner letter, when available. 573.6 (c)(10) – Copies of Dealer/Owner Aston Martin will provide a representative copy of the dealer bulletin, when available. Planned Dealer Notification Date : JUL 01, 2016 – JUL 01, 2016 Planned Owner Notification Date : AUG 01, 2016 – AUG 15, 2016 * NR – Not Reported

**************************************************************************************************************

OMB Control No.: 2127-0004 Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Manufacturer Name : Aston Martin Lagonda of North America Submission Date : JUN 24, 2016 NHTSA Recall No. : 15V-846 Manufacturer Recall No. : RA-01-0021 Manufacturer Information : Manufacturer Name : Aston Martin Lagonda of North America Address : Banbury Road Gaydon Warwick, United Kingdom 00 CV35 0DB Company phone : 999 Population : Number of potentially involved : 6,076 Estimated percentage with defect : 100 % Vehicle Information : Vehicle 1 : 2010-2015 Aston Martin DB9 Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : ALL Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door Sports Car Production Dates : AUG 14, 2009 – NOV 30, 2015 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFFDAAE8AGA12490 End : SCFFDAFM0GGB17078 ✔ Not sequential Vehicle 2 : 2010-2012 Aston Martin DBS Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : Sports Car Production Dates : APR 08, 2009 – SEP 03, 2012 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFFDCBD1AGE01487 End : SCFFBCCD2CGE13381 ✔ Not sequential Vehicle 3 : 2010-2016 Aston Martin V8 Vantage Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 DOOR SPORTS CAR Production Dates : JUN 25, 2009 – NOV 20, 2015 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFEBBAC4AGC13387 End : SCFEKBBK6GGD20410 Not sequential Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 Page 2 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Vehicle 4 : 2012-2012 Aston Martin Virage Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door Sports Car Production Dates : JAN 24, 2011 – AUG 31, 2012 Vehicle 5 : 2010-2016 Aston Martin Rapide Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 4-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 4 Door Sports Car Production Dates : MAR 30, 2010 – NOV 26, 2015 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFHDDAJ4AAF00068 End : SCFHMDBS4GGF05283 ✔ Not sequential Vehicle 6 : 2014-2016 Aston Martin Vanquish Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door Sports Car Production Dates : SEP 10, 2012 – NOV 26, 2015 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFLDCFP7EGJ00054 End : SCFPMCGU3GGK02881 ✔ Not sequential Vehicle 7 : 2011-2016 Aston Martin V12 Vantage Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door Sports Car Production Dates : JUN 24, 2010 – NOV 25, 2015 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFEBBCF4BGS00483 End : SCFEKBFR5GGS22411 ✔ Not sequential Vehicle 8 : 2012-2013 Aston Martin V12 Zagato Vehicle Type : LIGHT VEHICLES Body Style : 2-DOOR Power Train : GAS Descriptive Information : 2 Door Sports Car Production Dates : NOV 21, 2012 – JUN 14, 2013 VIN Range 1 : Begin : SCFEBBGF8CGS31182 End : SCFGBBGF5DGS31375 ✔ Not sequential Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 Page 3 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Description of Noncompliance : Description of the Noncompliance : The subject vehicles contain a full locking system software, which according to an interpretation letter issued by NHTSA, does not meet certain door lock requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 206, Door locks and door retention components (49 C.F.R §571.206). In the subject vehicles, each door is equipped with a locking mechanism with an operating means from the interior of the vehicle. However, when the full locking system is mobilised (by double locking the vehicle), this disengages the interior operating means for unlocking the door locking mechanism. As such, the full locking system is an effective anti-theft measure. FMVSS 1 : 206 – Door locks and door retention components FMVSS 2 : NR Description of the Safety Risk : In an affected vehicle, where the full locking system has been activated from the exterior, there is a risk that occupants are unable to unlock the doors from the inside of the vehicle. In relation to our 4-door sports cars (Rapide and Rapide S), this risk is the same as if a person were in a vehicle in which the child locks were engaged. However, all our vehicles have an acoustic warning device (i.e. horn), which can still be activated from the interior of the vehicle when the ignition is switched off and the full locking system is activated. Furthermore, some vehicles are fitted with an alarm system with interior detection, which is able to detect an occupant’s movement and will activate the vehicle’s alarm if the full locking mechanism is activated and occupants are detected inside the vehicle. Description of the Cause : At the end of September 2015, Aston Martin received a copy of the NHTSA 2007 interpretation letter addressed to Keykert USA. In that letter NHTSA deemed that a certain theft deterring double-lock function does not meet the requirements of FMVSS No.206. Aston Martin immediately conducted an investigation to analyse the functionality of the full locking system in its vehicles in the USA, and to determine if the condition – which is compliant with European standards, was non-compliant with the United States’ Door Lock requirements of 49 CFR § 571.206. Until then, we firmly believed we were fully compliant with both requirements, given they are worded identically. Identification of Any Warning that can Occur : an acoustic warning device (i.e. horn), which can still be activated from the interior of the vehicle when the ignition is switched off and the full locking system is activated. Furthermore, some vehicles are fitted with an alarm system with interior detection, which is able to detect an occupant’s movement and will activate the vehicle’s alarm if the full locking mechanism is activated and occupants are detected inside the vehicle. Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 Page 4 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Supplier Identification : Component Manufacturer Name : NR Address : NR NR Country : NR Chronology : At the end of September 2015, Aston Martin received a copy of the NHTSA 2007 interpretation letter addressed to Keykert USA. In that letter NHTSA confirmed that a certain theft deterring double-lock function does not meet the requirements of FMVSS No.206. Aston Martin immediately conducted an investigation to analyse the functionality of the full locking system in its vehicles in the USA, and to determine if the condition – which was compliant with European standards, was incompliant with the United States’ Door Lock requirements of 49 CFR § 571.206. Until then, we firmly believed we were fully compliant of FMVSS No.206. Our Recall Committee met on December 11 2015 and determined that the full locking system was not compliant with the U.S. requirements, and that notification in accordance with 49 CFR Part 573 was necessary. On January 5, 2016 Aston Martin filed for a petition for exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of the Motor Vehicle Safety Act pursuant to 49 C.F.R Part 556, on the basis that the noncompliance was inconsequential to motor vehicle safety (the “Petition”). Aston Martin received a letter from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on June 21 2016, which denied Aston Martin’s Petition. Aston Martin is now submitting its notification in accordance with 49 CFR Part 573. Description of Remedy : Description of Remedy Program : Remedy Aston Martin will disable the double locking feature on all affected vehicles by reprogramming the software. How Remedy Component Differs from Recalled Component : The software level in the Central Electronic Module is updated. Identify How/When Recall Condition was Corrected in Production : Update the vehicle car configuration file to disable the double locking function from production date 9th December 2015 Part 573 Safety Recall Report 15V-846 Page 5 The information contained in this report was submitted pursuant to 49 CFR §573 Recall Schedule : Description of Recall Schedule : Reimbursement Plan Owners of all potentially affected vehicles will be notified to take their vehicle to an Aston Martin dealer. The software update will be installed at no cost to the owner. Notification Schedule It is Aston Martin’s intention to notify all 6,076 customers (231 unsold cars with dealers, 5845 sold cars with customers) who are listed in the table above. Aston Martin will provide copies of the notification schedule, including mail dates for the owner letter, when available. 573.6 (c)(10) – Copies of Dealer/Owner Aston Martin will provide a representative copy of the dealer bulletin, when available. Planned Dealer Notification Date : JUL 01, 2016 – JUL 01, 2016 Planned Owner Notification Date : AUG 01, 2016 – AUG 15, 2016 * NR – Not Reported

**************************************************************************************************************

SEOCONTENT-END